Short answers to the objections that usually arise when people discover NEMO IMS.
No. It is better understood as an international monetary architecture: national currencies can remain, while international clearing and regenerative funding are reorganized.
Not mechanically. The system combines targeted creation for regenerative activities with destruction through transaction-based melting.
This is a governance question. NEMO IMS requires transparent criteria, scientific auditing and institutional checks against capture.
The aim is not to abolish sovereignty but to reduce dependence on hegemonic reserve currencies and debt-driven external constraints.
No. It is broader: it concerns money creation, exchange architecture, transaction melting and the direction of financial flows.
It keeps the idea of an international unit but gives it an ecological and regenerative mandate instead of a purely reserve-accounting function.
It is ambitious, but the current system is also an institutional construction. Monetary architectures have changed many times in history.